Search for: "Billings v. United States" Results 9521 - 9540 of 10,162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2008, 8:32 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT COURTGovernment Hospital Denied Judgment on Claim False Medicaid Bills Did Not Meet FCA Presentment Requirement United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 11:44 am
" On 25 March 2008, in Medellín v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 12:42 pm
As noted previously, a bill was introduced earlier this week that would do precisely that. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 12:41 pm
Litigation ensued and the United States Supreme Court ruled in Ayotte v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (GenericsWeb), Eularis analyses most effective generics defence strategies with new pharmaceutical industry report: (GenericsWeb), WIPO symposium to discuss life sciences multilateral environmental agreements: (Daily Dose of IP), Daiichi Sankyo and Ranbaxy confirm deal is binding and final, allay market rumour and speculation: (SmartBrief), Daiichi Ranbaxy takeover and the implications for the future of IP: (Spicy IP), Europe: Cancer Research Therapeutics’ RNAi patent revoked by EPO:… [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 5:51 pm
Berman (D-California) has presented a bill to complement the International Court of Justice’s decision in Mexico v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 4:21 pm
On March 25, in the case of one of these five (Medellin v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 6:41 pm
By Mark SpringBasics of the BillTwo United States Supreme Court Case interpretations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Sutton v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
  In one case widely seen as destined for the Supreme Court - United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
: (IAM), (Patent Circle), India takes open source approach to drug discovery: (Patent Lens), India: Indian Bayh Dole Bill: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP), (Does India need Bayh-Dole? [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:06 am
Yet we have had to litigate the Al-Haramain case in the shadow of secrecy, where the government wants the case to die quietly — without a court ruling on whether the president of the United States has broken the law. [read post]