Search for: "C. R. C." Results 9521 - 9540 of 58,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2009, 6:06 am
Como tem caráter terminativo, a proposta segue para análise da Câmara e, se for aprovada, para a sanção do presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 10:06 am by Michael Thomas
This application concerned a dispute over when the limitation period set out in s. 22 of the Insurance Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 266 is triggered in a claim for disability benefits. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 11:08 pm
 Here are some highlights of the court's opinion: The non-moving party in a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) is entitled to the same benefits as the non-moving party in a motion under Rule 12(b)(6). [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 10:07 am by Miquel Montañá
The Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”), in its recent judgment of 20 December 2017 (Case C-492/16, Incyte Corporation vs. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:56 am by gmlevine
“More importantly, it must be remembered that the most important ingredient of Policy ¶ 4(c)(i) is that the conduct relied on by the Respondent to establish its right or legitimate interest must be bona fide. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:11 pm by Giesela Ruehl
They argued that under Article 16 (1) of the Brussels I-Regulation German courts were competent to hear the case since the contract in question was a consumer contract in the sense of Article 15 (1) lit. c) of the Brussels I-Regulation. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 1:04 pm
Update [2008-2-15 17:29:13 by Big Tent Democrat]: I want to add that Rule 21 states: Subject to Rule 18.C. of these Rules, wherever any part of any section contained in these rules conflicts with existing state laws, the state party shall take provable positive steps to achieve legislative changes to bring the state law into compliance with the provisions of these rules. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 3:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
C.Colo.LCivR 7.2(c) provides that the parties must demonstrate why no alternative to restriction will adequately protect the interest in question. [read post]
These private placements are typically conducted under Rules 504, 506(b) or 506(c) of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as “safe harbors” that permit unregistered, non-public offerings of securities. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:37 pm by Michael Geist
Recommendation 5: We recommend that the proposed wording in Bill C-32 be changed so that any uses that qualify under the fair dealing provisions would not be subject to the anticircumvention prohibitions in the Act. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:52 pm by P.J. Blount
Space Law International Law Update: Space Law – The Judge Ben C. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 10:12 am
The following is from a letter we received this morning from Phyllis C. [read post]