Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States"
Results 9521 - 9540
of 14,935
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am
On Wednesday, June 26, he shared his strong disagreement with the majority’s ruling striking down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
In his column for Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman discusses Justice Scalia’s recent criticism of “the younger conservatives who were supposed to be the heirs to his mantle: Chief Justice John Roberts . . . and Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 8:58 am
(The Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States) Scott S. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
Broad coverage of the same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 4:59 am
Provides that the committee consists of: (1) the chief justice of the supreme court; (2) the chief information officer of the office of technology; (3) two members of the senate; (4) two members of the house of representatives; (5) one trial court judge; (6) two circuit court clerks, with one clerk for a county that does not operate under the state’s automated judicial system and one clerk for a county that operates under the state’s automated… [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:30 am
This year, I tried to explain to Erin that we were going to an event that would include the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:51 pm
This well-settled principle is common to the United States and India. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 7:25 am
The liberal bloc prevailed in 6 cases, including United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:39 am
“I think WikiLeaks, if you’ve looked at past history, you know, their focus isn’t necessarily the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:39 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:53 pm
Chief Justice John G. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:11 pm
United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:19 am
Chief Justice Roberts need only look to North Carolina to find evidence that the VRA and its coverage formula still have an essential purpose to serve today. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am
The original of the principle dates to the administration of President Washington when the administration asked Chief Justice John Jay for advice concerning a federal law. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:58 am
Madison — as quoted in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:02 am
I realize that to most people it's not even the fifth-most-interesting case decided this week, but I was particularly surprised and pleased to see Chief Justice Roberts's concurrence on Monday in United States v. [read post]
