Search for: "City of New York v. State of New York"
Results 9521 - 9540
of 10,061
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2008, 5:25 am
Paez, the New York County Civil Court dismissed a holdover case due to the landlord’s non-compliance with a law -- New York City Rent and Eviction Regulations § 2204.3 -- which requires landlords to file copies of certain notices served on rent-controlled tenants with the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal within a 48-hour timeframe.On appeal, the Appellate Term, First Department,… [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 3:01 am
[P]laintiff could not have sought a nationwide class action against an out-of-state corporation based on New York law. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 5:25 am
McKeon, another member of the panel, countered in a concurring opinion that, in New York State, there is “no temporal litmus test before an independent contractor becomes an agent for another. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 12:32 am
City of New YorkU.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 1:16 pm
Pharma/Biotech Patent Claim Drafting and Prosecution: West Coast patent attorneys Joyce Morrison and Robin Silva are chairing the ACI pharma/biotech patent drafting and prosecution conference Feb 25–26 in New York City. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 7:53 am
City of New York, No. 06-3886 "In case where police officer claims he was subjected to retaliation in violation of his First Amendment rights for writing a report about health concerns at his precinct, and filing a lawsuit that challenged personnel action taken against him in the wake of that report, dismissal of action is affirmed where the suit did not address a matter of public concern. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 6:34 am
However, the Court of Appeals relaxed this time frame yesterday in Ornstein v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 2:41 pm
The upshot is that the case will go back for a new trial on damages in New York County Supreme Court, and that New York City, through its Health and Hospitals Corporation, will face enhanced potential liability from needle-stick cases in the future. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
In a brave, new preemption world, such things might amount to breaches in the dike preventing liability. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:46 pm
The idea that they demonstrated "extreme and outrageous conduct," as required under New York law to bring a suit for intentional infliction of emotional distress, will most surely fail. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 5:25 am
Realty Corp. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 1:24 am
City of New YorkSubscription Required
NEW YORK COUNTYLandlord/Tenant Law
Notice of Termination Defective, Notice to Cure Prematurely Mailed; Holdover Action Dismissed
496 Broadway Realty LLC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 12:33 am
New York University NEW YORK COUNTYEnvironmental LawFranchise and Concession Review Committee's Approval of New Field's at Randall's Island AnnulledDistrict 4 Presidents' Council v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:35 am
Punchgini, Inc., involved a claim by the owner of the Bukhara restaurant in New Delhi, India, that a restaurant which opened in New York City under the same name was infringing its trademark rights. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
Congrats, New York. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 12:34 am
Source: New York Legislative Research System (LRS), February 3, 2008
Categories Indluded: Corrections Law, Criminal Procedure Law, Judiciary Law, Penal Law. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 12:20 am
New York City Health and Hospital Corp.U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 7:59 am
Plaintiffs claimed violations of the "Public Use Clause" of the Fifth Amendment and the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, along with a New York State law claim. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 7:59 am
Plaintiffs claimed violations of the "Public Use Clause" of the Fifth Amendment and the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, along with a New York State law claim. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:15 am
City of New YorkKINGS COUNTYCriminal PracticeTransfer to Civil Status Involves Liberty Interest That Cannot Be Forced on DefendantPeople v. [read post]
