Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 9521 - 9540
of 48,946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2011, 7:32 pm
Historically, compliance costs as a share of operating expenses is two and a half times greater for small banks than large ones. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 1:39 am
Brindle v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 6:50 am
Knox v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 12:11 pm
On July 27, 2012, the Court decided People v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:30 am
In Merriman v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 4:16 pm
There also is the argument that Armendariz requires "mutuality," which means that if an agreement is not entirely mutual, it is invalid as unconscionable.Well, in Giuliano v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:01 am
Dep't of Transportation v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 4:33 am
Request for reconsideration of a final administrative decision does not toll the running of the relevant statute of limitations Matter of Cappellino v Town of Somers, 2011 NY Slip Op 03234, Appellate Division, Second Department Cappellino v Town of Somers demonstrates, once again, that a disappointed individual’s reliance on a request for reconsideration of a final administrative decision to toll or extend the statute of limitations to file a timely appeal is misplaced… [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:56 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
Padmanabhan v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm
Americo Life, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 5:42 pm
This week, the California Court of Appeal in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:28 pm
So far, the decision that comes closest to discussing the availability of 998 offers in class actions is the Court of Appeal decision in Nelson v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:46 pm
That risk came home to roost for the defendant in Gniewkowski v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 10:52 pm
Steve reports the answer to that very question in the recently reported Illinois Appellate Court decision, Fox v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 10:47 am
The BAP upheld the decision of Bankruptcy Judge Kathleen Thompson, of the Central District of California, surcharging the Debtor’s homestead and household goods exemptions in the amount of the attorney fees and other costs incurred by the Trustee as a result of the Debtor’s refusal to vacate the home and related legal shennanigans aimed at frustrating the sale. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 4:39 pm
Supreme Court has ruled multiple times, such as in 1967’s Afroyim v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:51 am
In 1987, Federal judge Christine Cook Nettesheim accurately characterized the initial 1973 asbestos case, Borel v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:30 am
(Court v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 10:44 am
The reason why unreasonable contest counsel fees are rarely found these days is reflected in a recent decision by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, Grady v. [read post]
