Search for: "DOES 2-25" Results 9521 - 9540 of 16,479
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2014, 2:53 pm
Part 2 of the The Legal Intelligencer's ongoing series on Law Firm Competitive Intelligence came out on May 13th. [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:06 pm by Barry Barnett
Bain brought the case on May 5, 2009 -- just weeks before Jackson's death (by propofol and lorazepam) on June 25, 2009. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:16 am by Jordan Bublick
Bublick is a Miami Bankruptcy Lawyer with over 25 years of experience in filing Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 Bankrkuptcy Cases and Mortgage Modifications [read post]
13 May 2014, 5:32 am by Robert B. Milligan
Lastly, the bill does not preempt any other provision of law. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:21 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  On April 25, 2014, and as required by 2013 legislation (SB 743) the Judicial Council adopted new Rules of Court governing and aimed at significantly expediting litigation of CEQA challenges to a select class of “green” mega’ projects, i.e., those certified by the Governor as “environmental leadership development projects. [read post]
11 May 2014, 4:05 am by Administrator
Access to Information: DisclosureJohn Doe v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 1:37 pm
  They also extend to the 3rd Pillar duty to "take appropriate steps to ensure, through judicial, administrative, legislative or other appropriate means, that when such abuses occur within their territory and/or jurisdiction those affected have access to effective remedy" (GP Principle 25). [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:36 pm by Brian Shiffrin
" Subdivision 2 states "When the defendant is charged with a felony, the court may, in its discretion, order recognizance or bail. [read post]
9 May 2014, 2:15 pm by Jordan E. Bublick
January 2, 2008)(Ray, J.) the Bankruptcy Court was given the opportunity to interpret new section 222.25(4), Florida Statutes which allows a debtor to exempt personal property not to exceed $4,000 if he does not "claim or receive the benefits of a homestead exemption under s. 4, Art. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Smith, the 1990 religious freedom case in which Justice Scalia guts but does not forthrightly overrule old free exercise cases.) [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
__________________________ [1] Redish et al., supra note 2 at 644-646. [2] See e.g., Bisaillon v. [read post]