Search for: "Exist Inc" Results 9521 - 9540 of 25,341
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2016, 6:35 am
 The Ninth Circuit has rejected the 2005 Bridgeport Music Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Panthera Dental inc., 2015 QCCS 6555 https://t.co/ykzcuw3Ux2 -> Another case examining scope of Statute of Monopolies Apotex Inc. v Schering Corporation, 2016 ONSC 3407 https://t.co/ABAeS7Hifa -> Internet service providers, First Nations gird for fight over Quebec’s gambling law https://t.co/z4oDtznuLg -> TREB seeks ‘opt-in’ consent for MLS data to protect consumer privacy https://t.co/gyjeVz3KPR -> Four people plead guilty in theft and sale of… [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016)On April 12, 2016, the Supreme People's Court circulated its Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Certain Issues Concerning the Application of the "Company Law of the People's Republic of China" (IV) (Draft for Comments) (最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国公司法〉… [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Michael Erdle
The dispute related to Jacob’s claim for compensation for financing provided by Northland Power Inc. and Northland Capital Inc. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
., Inc. that a determination by the Army Corps of Engineers that a body of water falls under federal jurisdiction and is therefore subject to the Clean Water Act’s permit requirements can be appealed directly to the federal court system. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 7:15 am by Bloomberg
During its two decades in existence, Under Armour Inc. has cemented its reputation as a brand all about sports and sweat. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 11:08 am by David Jensen
The observer, who must remain anonymous, told the California Stem Cell Report,"Academic institutions at least do not exist at the whims of investors, they can manage risk of failure (it happens all the time), and grant money goes much further. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:30 am by John McFarland
XTO Energy, Inc., 407 S.W.3d 244, 249 (Tex. 2013), the Court set out the elements that the surface owner must prove to obtain relief under the accommodation doctrine: To obtain relief on a claim that the mineral lessee has failed to accommodate an existing use of the surface, the surface owner has the burden to prove that (1) the lessee’s use completely precludes or substantially impairs the existing use, and (2) there is no reasonable alternative method available to… [read post]