Search for: "HOPE v. STATE"
Results 9521 - 9540
of 16,492
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2013, 6:03 am
Arguing for state and local officials in Arizona v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 6:12 pm
Jones, that committee member Bryan Hughes hopes to unseal in his increasingly popular HB 1608.High-tech prison reform touted at SXSWToward 'virtual incarceration.' [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 10:16 am
Fund v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 8:18 am
Bully for Texas state Rep. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 12:17 pm
Hopefully, a recent Virginia decision, Horace Frazier Hunter v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 12:49 pm
In King v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
Meanwhile. over on SOLO IP, Barbara Cookson was writing about that issue which, many folk hoped, had all been resolved: the extent to which injunctions to stop patent infringement are just optional or pretty well mandatory. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:23 am
The holding in Gideon v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:50 am
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear an appeal from the Andhra Pradesh High Court's judgment in the AP Civil Liberties Committee v the Government of Andhra Pradesh tomorrow (the 12th of March 2013). [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:24 am
In the case from last week, US v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
The CourtStanding to Challenge US Wiretapping Law Denied: Clapper, Director of National Intelligence et al v Amnesty International USA et al On 26 February 2013, the United States Supreme Court (USSC) ((568 US) (2013)) upheld the federal law that enables the government to perform surveillance on Americans’ phone and email communications with people outside the United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 1:00 am
The record of the courts in fulfilling the hopes represented by Gideon is a dismal one.'' [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 10:24 pm
Talbot v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:58 am
This case is of particular interest to securities litigators because it is one of several cases since the landmark Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 8:59 am
See Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 5:16 am
The case, Wolfinger v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in National Australia Bank v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
He hoped to try to get them to agree to a balanced approach to governing with some tax hikes and spending cuts, but they only wanted spending cuts, with no new taxes whatsoever. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:58 am
Ass'n v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 10:05 am
Sebelius) and Arizona’s immigration restrictions (United States v. [read post]
