Search for: "Hope v. Hope" Results 9521 - 9540 of 23,991
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am by INFORRM
He hopes to achieve a landmark ruling similar to that obtained by Austrian privacy campaigner Max Schrems. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 6:25 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Here are a few more of her greatest hits for those not hip to her work:Still Convicting the InnocentProsecutorial Exceptionalism: Remedial Skepticism, and the Legacy of Connick v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
 The parents were told that there was basically no hope, and that they should give up. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 12:30 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Efforts by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to license tax return preparers were shot down by the courts in Loving v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
This distinction is difficult to grasp, hence this series of mini-exercises.Problem 23The statement:To prove that Defendant was fond of Plaintiff, Wanda Witness testified that Defendant said to Plaintiff, “I hope you’ll agree to go out with me. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 1:12 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The Court noted the hope that the intervenor would use the money saved to expand, but found that nothing required it to do so. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 4:14 pm by D. Daxton White
Instead the objective is to sort of arm the investment public with some of the information that I’ve picked up in my years of representing investors, with the hopes that some of the information will improve their relationship with their financial advisor, get them asking better questions and get things more in balance so that we can hopefully avoid situations where you would need me and so that that’s the goal each week. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 8:03 am by Ken White
 In the first episode:  fighting words, and why Chaplinksy v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm by Ed Gehres
The Roberts Court has ruled against tribal interests on numerous occasions, although admittedly the language and tenor of the decision last year in Michigan v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:51 pm by Giles Peaker
Gitere, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 3336 (Admin) The risks of a client deciding to go it alone at the last stage of judicial review proceedings. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:31 pm by Andy
Although the test for originality more generally has been refined on many occasions, most notably in recent times in Designers Guild [2001], Hyperion Records [2005], Baigent v Random House [2006] and more specifically with regard to photography, in Antiquesportfolio.com v Rodney Fitch [2001], the line taken by the UK courts has been that if the photographer uses sufficient skill and labour in his or her choices (such as the timing, choice of viewpoint, exposure, depth of field,… [read post]