Search for: "Light v. United States" Results 9521 - 9540 of 11,342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Studies now show that people eating dairy products like whole milk have less of a problem with heart disease than those who do not.In United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Holder, which advanced the false assertion that voters of color are no longer subject to systematic efforts to suppress their votes; Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 4 July 2018, Nicklin J heard an application in the case of BVC v EWF. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:33 am by Anubha Sinha
He discussed the issue in the light of a pending judgment by the US Supreme Court on Fair Trade Commission v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:37 am by Guest Barista
But two cases where the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari are the Two Pesos case and the Qualitex case. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
The two-day conferencegathered the intellectual acumen of many academic and professional leaders from Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Macau, mainland China, Netherlands, Singapore, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and  United States, to name but a few. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:51 pm by Amy Howe
” Laws in the United States, Sotomayor stressed, “have long singled out abortions for more onerous treatment than other medical procedures that carry similar or greater risks. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
 Perhaps unsurprisingly, in the case the United States filed an amicus brief noting all of that and arguing in favor of Ms. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 1:39 pm by Marty Lederman
  Instead, the initial question on the merits is whether, notwithstanding the absence of any such legal duty, the state nevertheless imposes “substantial pressure on an adherent to modify his behavior and to violate his beliefs," Thomas v. [read post]