Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 9521 - 9540 of 13,108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2011, 10:01 pm by Kali Borkoski
United States, is scheduled to be filed on Monday, May 9. [read post]
7 May 2011, 6:00 am by Gregory Dell
In addition to disability benefits, Russell has petitioned the Court for attorneys’ fees and any other relief it deems appropriate. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:33 pm by Dwight Sullivan
On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, and in light of United States v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:00 am by Greg Mersol
  SCI removed the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois under CAFA, alleging that the amount in controversy exceeded $5 million as required by 28 U.S.C. section 1332(d)(2). [read post]
4 May 2011, 6:17 am
Commissioner of Correction  ("On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court abused its discretion in denying certification to appeal and that it erred in (1) denying his motion to order disclosure of the medical records of trial counsel, (2) finding that he had failed to show that trial counsel provided per se ineffective assistance during jury selection under United States v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 8:54 pm
Individuals who receive U visas may remain in the United States for up to four (4) years and may eventually apply for lawful permanent residency. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
United States, 10-8532, for Reynolds v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:10 am by Colin Miller
Mediation is used in thousands of divorce-related custody disputes annually in the United States as evident by a fifty-state survey of custody mediation statutes. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:08 am by Kedar Bhatia
United States). 92% of paid petitions that were granted and scheduled for argument during OT10 appeared on our “Petitions to Watch” list (61 out of 66). [read post]
3 May 2011, 5:45 am by Michelle Lindo McCluer
Review granted on the following issue:WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT'S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:32 am
In Conrick v Myers, 461 US 1l38, the United States Supreme Court established a two-prong test with respect to claims of dismissal in retaliation for "whistle blowing. [read post]
2 May 2011, 10:35 am by Orin Kerr
”3) Today, May 2, 2011: The United States Supreme Court summarily reverses unanimously in a per curiam opinion, Bobby v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:17 am by James Bickford
-citizen mothers outside of the United States, and those born to unmarried U.S. [read post]