Search for: "State v. Michael A." Results 9521 - 9540 of 13,678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2011, 6:00 am by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
The article quotes one official:“Both black and white students lost an opportunity because of the state’s decision, and both deserve this aid,” said Brenda Edwards, who administers the Brown v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:19 am
A State Supreme Court justice denied the district attorney's motion for summary judgment. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:39 am by James Bickford
  Michael Kirkland of UPI describes the facts in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 7:29 am by admin
For more on the Court’s decision, see Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:47 am by Colin Murray
In the 1950s Leo Strauss had criticised the degree to which public debate in the United States had descended into what he described as “reductio ad Hitlerum“, whereby opponents of a policy would liken it to a fascist policy or label its proponents Nazis to score political points (regardless of the distinctions between the policy and those pursued by the Nazis). [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:20 am by WSLL
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Leda M. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:54 am by Marie Louise
(IP Whiteboard) ICANN development 1: The [.xxx] Factor (IP Whiteboard)   Global – Patents Nokia buries patent hatchet with Apple to help fund Windows Phone 7 switch (ArsTechnica) (PatLit) (Tangible IP) Patent licensing fees modest in total cost of ownership for cellular (IP finance)   Africa WIPO Director General announces Rights Registry Project for West African States (WIPO) (Afro-IP)   Australia Aussie anti-piracy group backflips on 3 strikes backflip (TorrentFreak)… [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:24 am by Charles O'Mahony
Sir Michael also stated that disability lawyers and advocates should look to the preparatory work of the Convention in order to shed light on the Convention. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:21 am by Amanda Rice
Also at SCOTUSblog, Briggs Matheson discusses Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]