Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 9521 - 9540
of 36,866
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2012, 5:10 pm
As exemplified by the trial of John Peter Zenger, juries had emerged as a protection of individual liberty as against the power of the state. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:17 am
Attorneys and state attorneys general. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:18 am
I’ll always remember the day the Supreme Court declared the Gun-Free School Zones Act unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:58 pm
As was stated in the cert petition, the Brulotte decision relies too heavily on the outdated irrebuttable presumption that patents confer market power. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 10:33 am
In Friedman v. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 4:30 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 9:15 am
This means the defendant was acting in an official capacity or using power given to them by the state. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Court rules that the appointing authority made its appointments consistent with the requirements of Section 61.1 of the Civil Service LawMatter of Cherry v New York State Civ. [read post]
6 Oct 2012, 7:43 am
In Longus v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:09 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:29 pm
New York State Liquor Authority, 476 U.S. 573 (1986); and Baldwin v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
The case since has settled.Computer Fraud and Abuse ActThe most significant CFAA case of the past several years has been United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 11:35 am
Vas-Cath v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
” As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:43 am
Commerce Energy Inc. (09-223) - federal court authority to rule on challenges to state taxes Tues., March 23: Kiyemba v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 3:46 pm
State v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:46 am
Virginia v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:02 am
Constitution:A state's ban on retailer-to-retailer sales of beer and wine is not subject to preemption by the Sherman Act; A state's ban on use of a central warehousing system for delivery and storage of wine and beer is not preempted by the Sherman Act;A state's post-and-hold pricing system was subject to preemption by the Sherman Act;A post-and-hold pricing system was per se a violation of the Sherman Act;A… [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:26 pm
Specifically, he cited Arizona v. [read post]
