Search for: "State v. Stai" Results 9521 - 9540 of 16,603
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The beginning of the story that forms the basis for the preliminary ruling of the CJEU in Diageo Brands BV v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:51 am
 This was - in a nutshell - the issue on which the Polish Supreme Court had sought guidance from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in OTK v SFP, C-367/15.This morning, contrary to the earlier Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston, the CJEU answered in the negative, holding that [para 28] "the fact that Directive 2004/48 does not entail an obligation on the Member States to provide for ‘punitive’ damages cannot be… [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and others heard 10th… [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 4:41 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
A recent decision from Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrew Borrok, Weinstein v RAS Prop. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
  While North Carolina has had its own share of assaults with unusual deadly weapons, see, e.g., State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
  While North Carolina has had its own share of assaults with unusual deadly weapons, see, e.g., State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 12:58 pm
(photo credit) In the trial of Prosecutor v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 2:27 pm by Don Cruse
The opinion was in THE STATE OF TEXAS AND THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:29 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
As we blogged HERE, this question was answered in the negative by the Illinois Supreme Court in Rosenbach v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:26 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
The latest opinion from the state Superior Court in the context of UIM bad-faith litigation is the case of Rhodes v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:51 am
If this kind of Islam grows and prospers in the United States - and this is already happening - it will not stay there. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:30 am
This is the court, remember, that directly and deliberately defied the United States Supreme Court in Miller-El v. [read post]