Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 9521 - 9540
of 13,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2012, 7:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am
The measure at issue is nearly identical to the ban in federal law struck down in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:35 am
United States, which raises the question of whether Padilla v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:44 pm
On February 7, 2012, the California Department of Fish and Game (DFG) issued a 60-day notice of intent to sue to the United States Army Corps of Engineers over its national levee vegetation removal policy. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:31 pm
City of Jackson, the United States Supreme Court affirmed that the ADEA recognizes a disparate impact theory. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:35 pm
Onetime adversaries in Bush v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:32 pm
Copyright protection in the United States was “effectively unavailable for pornography” until the landmark decision by the Fifth Circuit in Mitchell Brothers Film Group v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:42 pm
Miller, United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of California, ruled that Tilikum. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:55 am
Plaintiffs alleged that the Decedent was exposed to asbestos-containing gaskets, packing, and insulation materials found in or on the Defendants’ pump and valve products when Decedent served aboard ship in the United States Navy. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
Section 1441 provides generally that civil actions “of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction” may be removed. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:06 am
Kellogs v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:41 pm
Gore and Ted Olson, who represented former President Bush in that case, and served as Solicitor General after it -- could come up with a way to convince the courts (most importantly, a majority of the Supreme Court of the United States) to find a Constitutionally protected right to same-sex marriage. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 1:21 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:26 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 9:22 am
Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 692 (1946), the United States Supreme Court held, "it is only when an employee is required to give up a substantial measure of his time and effort that compensable working time (which is covered by the FLSA) is involved" In Lindow v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether federal immigration laws impliedly preempt Arizona’s controversial S.B. 1070. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:16 am
The first three paragraphs explain the scope of the decision in Perry v. [read post]
