Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 9521 - 9540
of 14,201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2012, 3:37 pm
ANTOINE SMITH, Appellant, v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 1:47 pm
The heart of the Article is a historical review of executive branch decisionmaking with respect to the five major military conflicts the United States has fought. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 12:27 pm
Just look at United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:31 pm
Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
When lawyer Dirk Lasater asked if we'd be interested in publishing these excerpts from his article “Closing Pandora’s Box: Speculative Invoicing and Opportunism in File Sharing”, we jumped at the chance. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:21 am
"United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:15 am
Texas Tort Claims Act 42 U.S.Code §1983 provides: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory … subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in… [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:40 am
Filburn (1942) and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:21 pm
It seems that he was wrong on that account too, at least according to the majority of the United State Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:41 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:05 pm
EMC Mortgage Corp., Case Number 1:09-cv-03106, United States District Court, Southern District of New York. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:33 am
Finally, a review of the details of the decision follows: Background of Pyott case: In September 2010, Allergan, Inc. entered into a settlement with the United States Department of Justice and pled guilty to criminal misdemeanor misbranding and paid a total of $600 million in civil and criminal fees. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 10:01 am
In an unpublished decision today, United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:15 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), which I’ve discussed in prior posts.In Kyllo, federal agents who suspected Danny Lee Kyllo was growing marijuana in hishome in a triplex, . . . used a thermal-imaging device to scan the triplex to determine if the amount of heat emanating from it was consistent with the high-intensity lamps typically used for indoor marijuana growth. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:12 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 4:59 am
The heart of the Article is a historical review of executive branch decisionmaking with respect to the five major military conflicts the United States has fought. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
But "Ohio State" has echoes of one of the key cases cited in support of the mandate: the 1942 decision in Wickard v. [read post]
