Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States"
Results 9541 - 9560
of 14,935
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 7:58 pm
Indeed, as Justice Scalia suggested, in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:32 pm
They 1) increased the bureaucratic rank of public security chiefs within the Party apparatus, 2) expanded the reach of the Party political-legal apparatus into a broader range of governance issues, and 3) altered cadre evaluation standards to increase the sensitivity of local authorities to social protest. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
The judgment orders the United States to pay money that it would not disburse but for the court’s order. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:27 pm
United States, 570 U. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1879) the Court explained states’ interests in regulating marriage with the simple declaration: “Upon [marriage] society may be said to be built. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Seeking to limit Windsor’s impact, the Chief Justice in dissent refers obliquely to “concerns for state diversity and sovereignty” in marriage law. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:58 pm
The Justices did not make us wait: the first opinion of the day came in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:24 am
His conclusion for the Court – joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan – in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 9:52 am
Windsor (Defense of Marriage Act)In United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:25 am
The question in the case was whether United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of 2003, which requires an organization to have a policy explicitly opposing prostitution and sex trafficking in order to receive federal funding to provide HIV and AIDS programs overseas, violates the First Amendment.In an opinion delivered by Chief Justice Roberts, the Court held by a vote of 6-2 that the policy requirement violates the First… [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:25 am
The question in the case was whether United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of 2003, which requires an organization to have a policy explicitly opposing prostitution and sex trafficking in order to receive federal funding to provide HIV and AIDS programs overseas, violates the First Amendment.In an opinion delivered by Chief Justice Roberts, the Court held by a vote of 6-2 that the policy requirement violates the First… [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:34 am
Brown)United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:30 am
§ 3162(a)(2); United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:00 am
Magarian’s comments on today’s decisions follow: The DOMA decision, United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:07 pm
Think of United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 3:01 pm
United States, Career Advice, CATO Institute, Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, Clarence Thomas, David Y. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:58 pm
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was the legislation that the United States needed to end the outrageously discriminatory voting practices that had flourished following the ratification of the Reconstruction Amendments. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
From 1861 to 1865, the United States fought a civil war. [read post]
