Search for: "Day v. United States" Results 9541 - 9560 of 25,654
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Jennifer Daskal explains why the court’s recent decision to review digital-privacy case United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a case about whether property owners are entitled to a jury when the federal government takes their land,” arguing that “[a] jury is key when it comes to compensation questions because the government has an obvious conflict of interest in appraising ‘fair’ market value. [read post]
“Specialty drugs” are a fast growing sector of the pharmaceutical industry and are predicated to represent 50 percent of drug expenditures in the United States by 2020.[1] Specialty drugs are typically dispensed by specialty pharmacies. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 1:40 pm by Dennis Crouch
United States, 273 U.S. 236 (1927) and TransCore, LP v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:51 am by Edith Roberts
United States, Town of Chester v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 2:22 pm
In response to Scott Dodson’s piece on Bowles v. [read post]
Hejran is staff counsel at Americans United for Life, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of 207 members of Congress in support of the respondent in June Medical Services v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:24 am
In general, when an immigrant is ordered to be removed/deported from the United States, the U.S. government (Attorney General) has ninety (90) days to remove that immigrant. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 8:15 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Background In March 2018, the United States Supreme Court held in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 1:18 pm
Supreme Court upheld new state death penalty laws allowing the resumption of executions in the United States.For more information about the Fast and Vigil and to see a schedule for this year's event, click here. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:55 pm by Michael Rinne
United States, the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana similarly held that interests in a family limited liability company were not present interests. [read post]