Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 9541 - 9560 of 12,455
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on March 1, 1971. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:30 am by Shaun Marker
April 27, 2011) the condominium association filed a lawsuit in state court against Pacific Insurance for breach of contract for refusing to extend coverage for the association’s Hurricane Wilma claim. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In each of the auxiliary requests 8 to 15, claim 11 was deleted.Before the oral proceedings (OPs), the patent proprietor withdrew its main request and auxiliary requests 1 to 7. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 1:11 am by Mandelman
So, fine then… let’s just jump right into this month’s Museletter… ~~~ 1. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 1:23 pm by Dave
  The Claimant claimed that Reg 13D(3) should be modified by reference to Art 8, Art 1 of the First Protocol, and Art 14, Human Rights Act 1998. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE IV If the offense for which extradition is requested is punishable by death under the relevant law of the requesting Party, but the relevant law of the requested Party does not provide for the death penalty in a similar case, extradition may be refused unless the requesting Party gives assurances satisfactory to the requested Party that the death penalty will not be carried out. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:04 am by Susan Brenner
Where, jurisdictionally, does the interception take place? [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:09 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In Neulinger & Shuruk v Switzerland [2011] 1 FLR 122, the Grand Chamber held that the return of a child from Switzerland to Israel would breach ECHR, art 8. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am by Maria Roche
RU had been complicit in this crime and was convicted in 27 October 1999 of causing grievous bodily harm with intent, contrary to section 18 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:54 pm by FDABlog HPM
  FDA says in the final guidance that “[a]s with our approach to the certification . . . , we will consider a verification to be deficient if it does not exactly mirror the words of the verification in section 505(q)(1)(I) of the Act or if the petitioner or commenter does not provide a month, day, and year for the ‘date’ in the verification” (emphasis added). [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:12 am by emagraken
[30] Nor does it appear that any written request was made to the plaintiff to list documents relating to the 2001 motor vehicle accident. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This stipulation does not apply to crimes or offences committed after the extradition. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This stipulation does not apply to crimes or offences committed after the extradition. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:17 pm by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/64699-1.pub.doc.pdf Division Two Court of Appeals State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This stipulation does not apply to crimes or offences committed after the extradition. [read post]