Search for: "Gooding v. United States"
Results 9541 - 9560
of 21,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2019, 8:17 am
United States is a short decision on a motion to strike evidence from the record. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
So, provided that absolute and relative grounds serve different purposes -– the protection of (i) a general interest and of (ii) the individual trade mark holder -- the AG stated that the relevant public has only one overall impression of the mark -- but that, for absolute grounds of refusal of registration the focus is on possible connections between the mark or its components and the goods and services covered while, for relative grounds, the focus is on the process… [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 11:27 am
The case, Ruan v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:31 am
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am
Answer: Because of the effect on “further appellate review” – which means the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 6:32 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
See Michael H. at 122-124 for a good example of Justice Scalia’s idea. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:18 am
United States
[read post]
23 Jul 2008, 8:32 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeCourt Erred by Reopening Case, Allowing Evidence After Jury Deliberations Begun; Retrial Ordered United States, appellee v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 5:03 am
(U.S. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:12 pm
When Brown v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 7:12 am
Here, the proposed protective order would not protect disclosure of records generated by a court of the United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
§ 371, which prohibits conspiracies to defraud the United States in the administration of elections. [read post]
25 May 2016, 3:30 pm
United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 9:11 am
E.E.O.C. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:53 pm
See Brown v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Supreme Court makes it clear that absent "exceptional circumstances," the Thirteenth Amendment bars compulsory labor "enforced by the use or threatened use of physical or legal coercion," citing United States v Kozminski 487 US 931 and a number of other cases. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:39 am
The Court has already used the compelling interest test to reject claimed exemptions from tax obligations (United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 9:40 pm
Procedural HistoryIn April 2008, SSL filed suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging that Citrix’s GoTo Products infringe claim 27 of the ‘796 Patent. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
