Search for: "Gooding v. United States" Results 9541 - 9560 of 21,084
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
This was a good week for underdogs of every stripe. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 8:27 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The district court concluded that the United States was a required party which could not be joined, but without which the action could not proceed in equity and good conscience, and dismissed the case. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm by Linda A. Kerns
” The United States Supreme Court recently tried to clarify the meaning of this law in the case Elonis v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Two days later, the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 10:44 am by Erik Eisenheim
The term “state,” as used in the ACA, has a broad meaning that encompasses “state” in the scholarly sense of a nation-state and the customized meaning of “state” as a sub-national unit of government. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 8:55 am by Victoria Kwan
Two days later, Justice Scalia appeared in Durham for the United States Tax Court’s Judicial Conference, which was hosted at Duke Law School. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:16 am
He was 49 and President of the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 11:54 am by Eugene Kontorovich
Then it concludes: “the Executive Branch determines whether the United States will recognize foreign states and governments and their territorial bounds. [read post]
By Jared Klaus and Allen Carter State bar associations and other licensing boards were left like bleeding seals in shark-infested waters following the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision this February in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
 (Under the law of the land, do the other 24 states still face the penalty for not expanding their Medicare eligibility even after NFIB v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am by John Ehrett
United States 14-1121Issue: (1) Whether a foreign seller's conduct can “involv[e] *** import trade or import commerce” even when the seller himself does not import any goods into the United States; (2) whether a foreign price-fixing agreement can have an effect on U.S. commerce that is “direct” and “gives rise to” a Sherman Act claim even when the agreement fixes prices only in foreign sales; and (3) whether… [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:44 pm by Jack Goldsmith
”  In support of his submission that the President has broad, undefined powers over foreign affairs, the Secretary quotes United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Ken White
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the motion. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:07 am by Dennis Crouch
  The IPR procedure is only being used against the best United States patents. [read post]