Search for: "Read v. United States" Results 9541 - 9560 of 30,083
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2013, 10:12 pm
The United States Supreme Court handed down somewhat of a shocking decision this week in the case of Maryland v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The 114-page complaint reads in part:Columbia ... has for decades been one of the worst centers of academic antisemitism in the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by EEM
 Read the introduction for a complete overview of the contents.Topical Issues:Systematising Systemic Integration: ‘War Refugees’, Regime Relations, and a Proposal for a Cumulative Approach to International Commitments [text]The Laws of War and the Protection of ‘War Refugees’: Reflections on the Debate and its Future Directions [text]Gender at the Intersection of International Refugee Law and International Criminal Law [text]The Interaction between International… [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:49 am
It does, according to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
Seth at Quizlaw tells us that; Section 6103 of Title V of the United States Code reads, in relevant part: (a) The following are legal public holidays: … Memorial Day, the las [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 11:38 am by Kyle Duncan
Hodges, fifteen states submitted an amicus brief cautioning that a decision constitutionalizing the issue of same-sex marriage would repudiate the Court’s own recent decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Case law on the “watchdog” role of NGOs (Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom). [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 6:24 am by Daniel J. Sargent
Born in 1882, Fujii had immigrated to the United States from Japan in 1903. [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:09 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
” This right was first recognized in 1906 by the United States Supreme Court in Winters v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:10 am
  The opinion is posted here.More to follow after a chance to read the opinion, but here's the short story: The Court has jurisdiction under Michigan v. [read post]