Search for: "STATE v. SMALL"
Results 9541 - 9560
of 16,894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2014, 4:36 am
Issues like federalism and state action doctrine do bear on 1A issues. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 12:30 pm
People v McFadden Court Discusses Conviction Against the Weight of the Evidence. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:18 am
” This statute, like the ones enacted in other states, was interpreted as to allow Medicaid to assert a lien on a recovery up to the amount, regardless of the amount of the recovery which is properly allocable to Medicaid (see, e.g., Baker v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 6:54 am
Additional Resources: Smothers v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 11:13 am
Hokto Kinoko Company v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 8:59 am
Interestingly, both the Virginia ruling and other similar recent decisions rely heavily on the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 5:37 am
Pointing to the nature of a small family-run business and the natural concern for the success of a family member, a federal district court in New York concluded that even though the alleged harasser was not the employee’s supervisor, a jury could find the requisite supervisory authority for vicarious liability under Vance v Ball State Univ. based on his influence over his stepson and wife, who was also a manager (Dillon v NED Management, Inc, February 11,… [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 3:50 am
In New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 1:12 pm
Substantially larger stakes were held in foreign equities from developed states (almost 25%) and developing states (about 9%). [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:36 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:07 am
” Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 5:49 am
And the agreement had small print. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Back to R. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 10:43 am
Judge Abrams wrote that this “argument is unpersuasive because it conflicts with the Second Circuit’s holding in Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Bernard v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 3:41 pm
Supreme Court’s decision last June, in Maryland v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 1:02 pm
I will add, however, that the authority of the Bankruptcy Court to hear a preference avoidance action, or indeed any action, is in a state of flux due to the Supreme Court’s holding in Stern v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 12:22 pm
State, 103 So.3d 184 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), rev. denied, State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 7:52 am
In 2007, the Court held in Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 2:45 am
Have HR reps practice routine functions where stray remarks or small missteps could lead to big liability. [read post]
