Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 9541 - 9560
of 13,837
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 9:31 pm
City of Jackson, the United States Supreme Court affirmed that the ADEA recognizes a disparate impact theory. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:35 pm
Onetime adversaries in Bush v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:32 pm
Copyright protection in the United States was “effectively unavailable for pornography” until the landmark decision by the Fifth Circuit in Mitchell Brothers Film Group v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:42 pm
Miller, United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of California, ruled that Tilikum. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:55 am
Plaintiffs alleged that the Decedent was exposed to asbestos-containing gaskets, packing, and insulation materials found in or on the Defendants’ pump and valve products when Decedent served aboard ship in the United States Navy. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
Section 1441 provides generally that civil actions “of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction” may be removed. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:06 am
Kellogs v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:41 pm
Gore and Ted Olson, who represented former President Bush in that case, and served as Solicitor General after it -- could come up with a way to convince the courts (most importantly, a majority of the Supreme Court of the United States) to find a Constitutionally protected right to same-sex marriage. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 1:21 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:26 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 9:22 am
Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 692 (1946), the United States Supreme Court held, "it is only when an employee is required to give up a substantial measure of his time and effort that compensable working time (which is covered by the FLSA) is involved" In Lindow v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether federal immigration laws impliedly preempt Arizona’s controversial S.B. 1070. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:16 am
The first three paragraphs explain the scope of the decision in Perry v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:37 pm
The decision hangs heavily on Romer v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:51 pm
In a 2-1 decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that a California voter initiative [Proposition 8] stripping same sex couples of the right to marry is unconstitutional. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:10 pm
Gore, United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:40 pm
United States Bank Nat’l Ass’n, __ Cal. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 1:39 pm
” One-E-Way Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:33 pm
” Today, the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit upheld Judge Walker's ruling. [read post]
