Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 9541 - 9560
of 29,602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2018, 2:06 pm
As Hinkle and Nelson explain, the Supreme Court in the 1992 case Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 10:30 am
States could stop spending their own funds to prop up the weakened ACA exchanges and their plans. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm
(For purposes of the discussion, the participants really didn’t draw many distinctions between public and private universities, since most prominent private universities try to hold themselves—sometimes, as in California, because state law requires them to do so—to the same First Amendment standards that bind public institutions. [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:28 pm
The board had already conducted a review of the redevelopment plan under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and adopted a negative declaration, but this review had not addressed the possible impacts of condemning property under the redevelopment. [read post]
3 May 2018, 11:15 am
Special Rules for Domestic Violence Cases in Michigan In People v Rosa, 336445, the Michigan Court of Appeals interpreted one of the special evidence rules that apply to domestic violence cases. [read post]
3 May 2018, 10:05 am
Hackney v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 7:45 am
Bank v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 5:00 am
Finally, the complaint alleged that Pretium defrauded investors by stating that it was planning, with Strathcona, to increase the portion of the sample drawn from the Cleopatra Vein when, in fact, Strathcona objected to skewing the sampling program. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:59 pm
Whytock, State Remedies for Human Rights, 98 B.U.L. [read post]
2 May 2018, 3:23 am
And at the Supreme Court, during last week’s oral arguments in the travel ban case, Trump v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:55 pm
Third, the fact that Mueller wants to ask a question does not mean he is planning to bring charges related to that point. [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:38 am
§ 102 [2] Complaint, Solid Oak Sketches, LLC v. [read post]
Howard Geneslaw Argues Before NJ Supreme Court in Dunbar Homes on Behalf of NJ State Bar Association
1 May 2018, 6:29 am
Geneslaw, a Director in the Gibbons Real Property Department, argued before the Supreme Court of New Jersey on behalf of the New Jersey State Bar Association (“NJSBA”) as an amicus curiae in the matter of Dunbar Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:46 pm
The petition of the day is: Andersen v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm
Kimberly McCauley is a California anti-vaccination activist, who has been in the news expressing her views. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:19 pm
Commodity Futures Trading Commission in Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 11:08 am
Not in the case of Wigley v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 11:08 am
Not in the case of Wigley v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:05 am
What happens to joint custody when the child begins school In Griffin v Griffin, no 338810, Mich App Jan 2018, the Michigan Court of Appeals was faced with this question: what to do when the child reaches school age. [read post]
