Search for: "State v. Register" Results 9541 - 9560 of 13,705
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2011, 3:03 am by SHG
Subsequent to our decision, Respondents filed a petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the United States Supreme Court decided Cavazos v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 6:21 am by Kiran Bhat
United States, urging the Court to strike Arizona’s controversial immigration law. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 4:48 am by Chris Laughton
Like me (but he expresses it far more eloquently in Virtualpurple), Norris J prefers the decision of HHJ McCahill QC in Hill v Stokes Plc [2010] EWHC 3726. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by SHG
  As a method of explanation, it seems that Orin may well be onto something, as reflected in this exchange from City of Ontario v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:57 am by Susan Brenner
On January 5, 2011, . . . the Government learned that this Blog is registered to [Cassidy]. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 1:05 am
(b) Is a court of a Member State permitted to apply a national provision (here the second sentence of Paragraph 26(3) of the Law on trade marks (MarkenG)) which conflicts with a provision of a directive (here Article 10(1) and (2)(a) of Directive 89/104/EEC) in cases in which the facts of the case had already occurred prior to a decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in which indications of the incompatibility of the Member State's legislation with the… [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by Ken
For a sense of just how badly wrong Marc is about the scope of the First Amendment, consider the recent dismissal of the twitter-stalking case in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:51 am by admin
  The Defendant filed a federal trademark application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) in May of 2011 to register the “Terrible T-Shirt” phrase as a trademark for use on T-Shirts. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Penal Code Section 115(a) provides that “Every person who knowingly procures or offers any false or forged instrument to be filed, registered, or recorded in any public office within this state, which instrument, if genuine, might be filed, registered, or recorded under any law of this state or of the United States, is guilty of a felony. [read post]