Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 9541 - 9560
of 40,669
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
Clayton County, Georgia, No. 17-1618, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
From Platforms to Workflows: Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey – Fall 2019 Results
5 Sep 2019, 2:42 pm
A Decision Tree to identify documents pertaining to financial derivatives might first determine whether or not a document contained the word “swap. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:53 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
As the Federal Circuit stated in Chamberlain citing Alice v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:51 am
One case in particular, Glawischnig-Piesczek v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:30 am
Word is out that the Title VII trilogy set for argument in the Supreme Court on October 8 — Bostock v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
As Justice Ginsburg wrote for a majority four years ago in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:13 pm
Imprisonment Firstly, Ms Haigh correctly states that she was sent to prison, but the sentence she received was nothing to do with the ‘telling the truth’ she refers to in the same breath (we’ll come to that bit in a minute). [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 11:30 am
Loving v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 10:13 am
United States, No. 18-1851 C (Ct. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:46 am
The privilege predated this nation, and was explained 180 years ago by the United States Supreme Court in Stein v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
“Tool Without A Handle: A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1] This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm
United States Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has considered how the FTC can help safeguard privacy rights with legislative mandates from Congress. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am
This approach is more in keeping with the presidential system in, for example, the United States, and not consistent with the Westminster form of government, in which an election can occur at any time, with the approval of the Governor General. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am
Later, the Court of Justice of the EU brought a bit more balance into that analysis with its Huawei v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 8:24 am
by Dennis Crouch Amgen v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:15 am
The German AAII does list those ten German Nokia v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 5:23 am
Rarely, by which I mean I can’t recall it ever happening before, has anyone been outraged at the New York State Board of Parole for releasing a prisoner. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 1:30 am
Luckily, the CJEU is slated to decide this question, and Advocate General Hogan gave their thoughts on this earlier this summer.The case of Consorzio Tutela Aceto Balsamico di Modena v BALEMA GmbH concerned balsamic vinegar from the region of Modena – "Aceto Balsamico di Modena" (PGI application here). [read post]
