Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 9541 - 9560
of 13,857
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
(A case pending in front of the United States Supreme Court may answer this question. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 1:59 am
California. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Here is what Justice Ginsburg wrote: Montana’s experience, and experience elsewhere since this Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
For the second time in a year, a United States District Court has held that claims based on California’s meal and rest period laws are preempted by federal law. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
For the second time in a year, a United States District Court has held that claims based on California’s meal and rest period laws are preempted by federal law. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:48 am
Image via WikipediaIn Edgar Rice Burroughs, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
United States District Judge Lynn N. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
Opponents of the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:55 pm
Fry Consulting Pty Ltd v Sports Warehouse Inc (No 2) [2012] FCA 81 Share on Facebook [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 10:46 am
The United States Life Ins. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
The university was sued by the state of California and shut down in 1999 for failure to meet minimum academic standards. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:26 am
The second case to recently come out of the Eastern District, Brafman v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
In this case, United States District Judge Garland E. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:56 pm
United States, 362 U. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:22 am
United States, 525 F.3d 1139 (Fed. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am
The measure at issue is nearly identical to the ban in federal law struck down in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
United States v. [read post]