Search for: "Young v. Young"
Results 9541 - 9560
of 12,303
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2010, 1:00 am
The appellate court decision mentioned only one case, Young v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:55 pm
Captioned Nasser Al-Alauqi v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:21 am
Retired Army Chief General V P Malik, Lieutenant General Vijay Oberoi (retired Vice Chief of Army Staff) and a civil servant to be appointed by the Centre would be the members. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 1:17 am
State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 1:19 pm
Ben-Tzvi v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 7:44 am
Perhaps DC Comics might feel inclined to move, says Merpel, since at least one SUPERMAN figurative mark is registered in the UK for goods in class 5, including "pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations" and, for the young at heart, "baby aspirin". [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:30 am
Corp. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 7:37 pm
Pepper v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 4:41 pm
The Delaware Supreme Court recently made its most emphatic negative response to this proposition to date in Lyondell Chemical Company v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 10:07 am
(C. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 12:33 pm
" Jonathan V. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 7:19 am
Arthur Young & Co., 3 Cal. 4th 370, 384–94, 834 P.2d 745 (detailing contrasting approaches to auditor liability). [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 2:47 pm
Cumings-Peterson Al-Kidd v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 2:12 pm
Supreme Court case Hernandez v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 7:10 am
During the period from Johnny's diagnosis until his third birthday, Resources for Young Children and Families provided funding for an in-home program. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:07 am
An early example of the Great British double entendre Zoe Renault v Renault Zoe. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:27 am
Merton London Borough Council v Sinclair Collis Ltd [2010] WLR (D) 286 “Notwithstanding the civil complaint procedure embodied in s 7(2) of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 (as amended), a sale of tobacco to a person under the age of 18 through a cigarette vending machine was capable of being an offence contrary to s 7(1) of the 1933 Act. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:47 pm
This decision, made by Sir Charles Gray, referred to s.39(1)(a) of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 11:22 am
Young v. [read post]
