Search for: "jonathan"
Results 9541 - 9560
of 26,102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2017, 1:41 pm
Jonathan Gienapp of Stanford's history department has a response to the recent discussion of originalism at process, the OAH's blog. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 8:07 am
It was here that I discovered Jonathan Spence’s work To Change China. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 7:01 am
Jonathan sees the virtue in the nuance. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 6:38 am
Mark Coen Jonathan Doak Abstract: English juries do not provide reasons for their verdicts. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 2:00 am
Tulane University Law SchoolJonathan Glater, Professor of Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law presents today as part of the Regulatory Workshop Series. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 11:22 am
Wolff, Jonathan and Avner de-Shalit. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 4:05 am
A Response to Brian Leiter, (March 21, 2017).Jonathan R. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:37 am
Ms Hopkins is being represented by Solicitor Advocate David Price QC (who has returned from sabbatical) and Jonathan Price. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm
Research and Resources Networked Privacy and Security, Jonathan Cave, University of Warwick. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 5:54 am
And, while I’m on the topic of originalism, here is my Georgetown Law colleague Randy Barnett’s response to Jonathan Gienapp’s blog post, Constitutional Originalism and History, and here is an additional observation by another Georgetown Law colleague, Lawrence Solum. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:26 am
There are several other reasons why the decision of the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers was aberrant. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 1:11 pm
He offers this real-world example: “I think that the ‘deplorables’ comment could well have changed the course of human history. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
I am happy to announce the publication of my article: "A Lex Mercatoria for Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Without the State? [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 8:55 am
While Jonathan Griffiths (Queen Mary University, London), was prepared to accept the importance of fundamental rights for copyright law, he pointed out that lifting copyright law disputes to the level of fundamental rights was not without problems. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:17 pm
For a media lawyer who has been battling “fake news” for his entire career – as well as robustly defending good investigatory journalism – there is a rich irony that the Culture Media and Sport Committee of the House of Commons is belatedly to take an interest in fake news and is engaging in a public consultation. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 3:04 am
[Eric Roston, Bloomberg] Stadium subsidies for the Patagonia set: outdoor gear makers push federal Western land grabs [Terry Anderson] Washington Post account of Wyoming rancher Clean Water case might deserve a Pinocchio or two of its own [Jonathan Wood] “When should the federal government own land? [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 12:26 pm
The three speakers are an extraordinarily impressive group: Jonathan Lear, John U. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:17 am
Following the UK Government’s delivery to the EU of the letter triggering Article 50, Jonathan Herbst provides a brief update from a financial services perspective. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:12 am
Thanks to Jonathan Falk for the pointer. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:38 am
"New Mexico student loses free speech appeal over anti-lesbian essay": Jonathan Stempel of Reuters has this report on a ruling that a unanimous two-judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
