Search for: "Herring v. State"
Results 9561 - 9580
of 58,406
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am
This judge began his analysis of the motion by noting that to “`“state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and (2) that the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the color of State law. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 2:13 pm
We share her reluctance to apply United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
The media frenzy so tainted the case that the United States Supreme Court released him and ordered a 1966 retrial in the case Sheppard v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 8:34 am
Scinto v London Borough of Newham [2009] EWCA Civ 837 is an appeal from Bow County Court on whether the tenant was still entitled to exercise her right to buy on terms first set out in December 1999. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:07 am
The First Department affirms.The case is Salemi v Gloria's Tribeca Inc., decided on March 20. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 5:03 am
" Barrett v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:05 pm
The ruling came in Lenz v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 4:55 pm
Beckwith v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:30 am
Ohio tells us is that her home was searched without a warrant, and the jurisprudence of Fourth Amendment Exclusionary rules extends to the states. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_09018.htm_________________Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty Under the Circumstances imposed on officers and employees of New York State and its political subdivisions. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_09018.htm_________________Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty Under the Circumstances imposed on officers and employees of New York State and its political subdivisions. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
The leading case on this issue is McGugan v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:24 am
As support for this conclusion, the Court referred to the plain and ordinary meaning of "complaint", how workplace safety laws have been interpreted in other states, how the federal workplace safety law has been interpreted and finally to a prior decision by the Kentucky Court of Appeals, Terminix Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:44 am
State v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:25 am
The justices once again did not act on Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 5:14 pm
In Alshafi Tate v. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:21 pm
See State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 2:43 pm
United States. [read post]
19 May 2009, 3:12 pm
In Kravar v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:06 am
Recently, defendants in Fasanello v. [read post]
