Search for: "I v. B"
Results 9561 - 9580
of 24,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2014, 12:14 pm
G.S. 15A-1368.2(b). [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 11:02 pm
On April 30, 2018, California Supreme Court rendered its decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:11 am
I hope everyone had a good Memorial Day weekend. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 2:16 pm
I briefly considered recording all this like a legit podcast but a. that is a lot of effort and b. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:47 pm
This question was directly addressed in Stephanie Ann Novick v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
The case is Florida Wildlife Federation v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 4:12 am
The trend may continue to consider student-athletes as employees and allow them access to workers' compensation benefits.Ralph Johnson v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:54 pm
" 28 U.S.C Section 1332(d)(11)(B)(i). [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 4:27 am
Sky had made out its case of infringement under the Trade Marks Act 1994 section 10(2)(b) and Regulation 40/94 [now Regulation 207/2009] article 9(1)(b) [ie (i) identical or similar services, (ii) similar marks and (iii) likelihood of confusion, including a likelihood of association]. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:47 am
Do you remember the tale of Customs Fraud Investigations, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 12:30 pm
Below is a brief description of each rule, including the statutory authority therefor; and where appropriate, a statement setting forth the ongoing need for each rule without further modification. 2000 Amendment to Chapter I of Title 4 of NYCRR (Rules for the Classified Service) Statutory Authority: Civil Service Law section 6 Description of the Regulation: The resolution added a new subdivision (vii) to paragraph (2) of section (b) of Rule 4.5 to provide for a… [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:22 am
(2) Must Article 5(3) of [the Brussels I Regulation] must be interpreted as meaning that the tort occurred in a Member State where the wrong which was the subject of the proceedings or the original claims raised was committed in another Member State (Member State B) and consists of participation in the wrong (the principal wrong) committed in the first Member State (Member State)? [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Miglino v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:37 am
If he does this then one possible outcome would be that the gap that I have identified is plugged and the present decision becomes justified. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 4:00 am
§ 702, and the judge-made equitable remedy recognized in Ex Parte Young and clarified as such a judge-made remedy in Armstrong v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 12:30 pm
Below is a brief description of each rule, including the statutory authority therefor; and where appropriate, a statement setting forth the ongoing need for each rule without further modification. 2000 Amendment to Chapter I of Title 4 of NYCRR (Rules for the Classified Service) Statutory Authority: Civil Service Law section 6 Description of the Regulation: The resolution added a new subdivision (vii) to paragraph (2) of section (b) of Rule 4.5 to provide for a… [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 12:58 pm
As a non-precedential decision on claim construction, Horizon Pharma, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 12:16 pm
Judge Johnnie B. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:23 pm
I can find nothing, however, humorous in the facts found in United States v. [read post]
