Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE"
Results 9561 - 9580
of 40,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2010, 2:15 pm
• MobileMedia Ideas, LLC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:01 am
In McCormick v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 2:33 pm
Tom Clark, who writes the excellent Fiduciary Matters Blog, gave me either a late Christmas or an early New Year's present when he forwarded me, last week, the district court's December 30th decision in Spano v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:15 am
In Apple v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 9:34 am
Under McCormick v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
Bauman v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am
The first case is Glyn v Weston Feature Films Ltd which concerned public morality as the work was largely about an adulterous affair. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Next week, the Supreme Court will hear argument in the case of Holt v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 2:57 pm
See Bob Jones Univ. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 9:02 am
Even established creators may suffer from the presence of a large quantity of knockoffs in the market, since they dilute the value and perceived quality of originals. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am
Florida, Sullivan v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 3:22 am
However, it was not until June 2014, in the later stages of litigation (faced with an application made against Transform to disclose its insurance position), that Travelers and Transform, in reliance upon advice provided under a joint retainer, chose to voluntarily reveal that a large number of the claims were uninsured. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:18 am
The Supreme Court’s reasoning was as follows: Non-disclosure of the commissions Lord Sumption held that the decision in Harrison v Black Horse Ltd, the leading Court of Appeal authority, was wrong. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 8:16 am
The previous leading authority on “white list” designation was R (Javed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] EWCA Civ 789. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 10:25 am
See A & H Sportswear, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:17 am
I think this week’s ruling in Burdick v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:55 am
In this post, Jack Prytherch, Of Counsel in the Tax team at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v NHS Lothian Health Board [2020] CSIH 14. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
He held that the critical questions in the appeal were whether there is a rational connection between the legislative objective and the policy, and whether it goes no further than is necessary to achieve the objective. [10] Lord Kerr stressed that the objective was not to create as large a database as possible as a resource for fighting crime. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
[A guest post on Fulton v. [read post]
