Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 9561 - 9580 of 9,857
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2007, 9:52 pm
Florida's constitution and law, as well as the Constitution of the United States,guarantee Mr. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 9:41 am
Let us start today with an August 3, 2007 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia -- the court that Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and John Roberts sat on before they were anointed to the Supreme Court as a reward for their reactionaryism -- in a case called Abigail Alliance For Better Access To Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach . [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 10:15 am
Songying Fang, Tim Johnson, and Jason Roberts (all of the University of Minnesota Political Science Department) have posted "Will of the Minority: Rule of Four on the United States Supreme Court" on SSRN, see here. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 2:08 am
KPMG Defendants Seek Postponement of Trial New York Law Journal Following the dismissal of charges against 13 of the 18 ex-KPMG employees in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:44 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), the most on-point United States Supreme Court decision in the area. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 7:21 pm
J. 875 (2007), which is generally about KSR v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 10:38 pm
Regardless of what Stevens was asked during his confirmation hearings, Roe v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
Charles Swift, counsel to Salim Hamdan, the enemy combatant whose legal case, Hamdan v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
" in the same paragraph in Westlaw produced 16 hits just in the United States Supreme Court - as recent as Watters v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 5:27 pm
To be sure, in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:40 am
Second, is the Supreme Court's opinion and reasoning in United Saving Ass'n v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
Kaplan on Monday prevented attorneys Robert Fink and Caroline Rule from withdrawing as defense counsel to former KPMG partner Richard Smith in United States v. [read post]