Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 9561 - 9580 of 16,404
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2014, 7:43 am by Joy Waltemath
OEF and Hugo occupied different office space in two different states and were incorporated under different states’ statutes. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:25 pm by John Stigi
  The Court examined the impact of the United States Supreme Court’s intervening decision in Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Since Mrs Justice Collins Rice handed down judgment in Fox v Blake [2024] EWHC 146 (KB) there has been a lot of online discussion about the case. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
The Constitution states that members of Congress—along with every state legislative official and every judicial and executive official of both the state and federal governments—“shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am by David Super
  That settlement was achieved through popular constitutionalism rather than Article V, leaving the election challengers two diametrically opposite choices. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 9:09 am by Dennis Crouch
Find that the case is moot and vacate the PTAB decisions upholding the patent under cases such as United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 3:23 am by Dennis Crouch
File Attachment: NY IP Law Ass'n--ISO Neither Party.pdf (735 KB) Efforts in some decisions to dissect the claim into old and new parts or computer and non-computer elements, should be rejected as squarely inconsistent with the Supreme Court's holdings in Diamond v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:36 pm by Samuel Goldberg
For example, the SJC has permitted such checkpoints as an exception to the individual suspicion requirement “‘on the grounds that a “reasonable” roadblock involves a “minimal” state intrusion upon the reduced privacy of drivers, one that is outweighed by the strong public interest in reducing the carnage caused by drunk drivers,’” as Judge Hely said, quoting the SJC’s 1989 Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 4:59 am by Jennifer González
She was a strong advocate for the agricultural industry, often voting against President Roosevelt to pass legislation that was vital to her home state. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 10:52 pm
  That message comes from Judge Stephan Reinhardt of 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2008, 3:01 pm by James Peters
These employers think that even if the wife makes twice as much as her husband, she should quit her job to raise the children.A more poignant way of expressing this can be found in Knussman v. [read post]