Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 9561 - 9580 of 14,281
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
We talked about some of the many battles this interaction has birthed, from massive resistance against Brown v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 9:49 am
The Agreement states in part: 'Each party waives the provisions of California Probate Code Section 143 and California Family Code Section 1615 relating to financial disclosures. . . . [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:36 am by Matthew Flinn
The issue of publicity more generally, and the issue of parties to an Inquiry being able to cross-examine witnesses, was addressed to some extent by the Court of Appeal in R (D) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] EWCA Civ 143, albeit in the context of an investigation into a death in custody under Article 2 of the ECHR. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:41 pm by Richard Frank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from last December’s federal district court decision in Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:46 pm
  A strong impulse is to work backwards--to extrapolate from effects the framing ideologies that give rise to the provisions producing effects. [read post]