Search for: "Thomas v. State"
Results 9561 - 9580
of 15,502
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
In Krupski v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
” He also quoted in part a dissent from Justice Clarence Thomas in Trump v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 4:42 am
” Dionne v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:02 am
The court ruled yesterday in Iancu v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:17 am
However, the court also seemingly paved the way for future litigants to argue for different disparate impact standards under state vs. federal law (Pippen v State of Iowa, July 18, 2014, Appel, B). [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 1:21 pm
As Justice Thomas stated in dissent, the decision arguably is inconsistent with the Court’s pro-defendant decisions in Wal-Mart and Comcast. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:07 am
In the 1973 decision of San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 2:28 am
., v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:36 am
In Wallace v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:20 pm
In Burwell v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:51 am
Also today, Justice Thomas dissented from the denial of certiorari in Rogers County Board of Tax Roll Corrections v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:43 pm
In Federation v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:28 pm
In Federation v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 9:01 am
In Cohen v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 7:28 am
" Jaynes v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:55 am
The college asked a State Supreme Court judge to confirm the arbitration award [see Section 7510, Civil Practice Law and Rules]. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:44 pm
In a 9-0 decision authored by Justice Thomas, the United States Supreme Court reversed, holding that because Section 1132(g)(1) does not use the term “prevailing party,” district court judges have discretion to award attorneys’ fees to either party, even in a situation where there is no judgment in favor of the plan participant. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 7:12 am
More from our authors: Concise European Copyright Law Second Edition by Thomas Dreier, P. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:08 pm
The opinion they joined (in another 5-4 decision with just this lineup) in Iqbal v. [read post]
