Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 9561 - 9580 of 24,129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2017, 12:58 pm by Scott Bomboy
Washington state, supported by Minnesota and Hawaii, has made several arguments demanding Robart’s order remain in place. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:35 am by Kayla A. Haines, Esq.
The court observed that, according to federal statute, the United States District Courts have exclusive jurisdiction over a title 11 case, which it may cede to a bankruptcy judge. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am by Tiffany Blofield
  The case involving the REDSKINS mark is currently on hold until the United States Supreme Court decides the In re Tam case. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 2:13 pm by Perry Dane
The other type of argument, though, goes to the more general claim that at least "those aliens [who] are outside the United States and have never been admitted to this country" can assert no constitutional rights in the first place. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that he was arrested, incarcerated, and criminally prosecuted for engaging in constitutionally protected free speech and was detained and arrested without probable cause in violation of the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm by Orin Kerr
The best case in support of a due process right for a provider to challenge an assistance order is In re Application of the United States of America, 610 F.2d 1148 (3d Cir. 1979). [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm by Victoria Kwan
Two decades after writing the landmark United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am by Dennis Crouch
The AIA, Its Preclusion Statutes, and Cuozzo’s Path to the Supreme Court The 2011 America Invents Act (AIA) created new patent reviews within the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO): inter partes review (IPR), post-grant review (PGR), and covered business method review (CBM). [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:53 pm by Patrick E. Knie
The insurance company filed a motion for summary judgment, which the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Orangeburg denied. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:53 pm by Patrick E. Knie
The insurance company filed a motion for summary judgment, which the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Orangeburg denied. [read post]