Search for: "Weeks v. United States" Results 9561 - 9580 of 19,106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
4 May 2018, 11:58 pm by Anthony Zaller
  The California Supreme Court recognized this in Dynamex, stating: As the United States Supreme Court observed in Board v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2024, 10:41 am by Giles Peaker
In mid-July the first appellant, Zaid Alothman Holdings Limited (leaseholder of 30 units in Phoenix Place) instructed Mishcon de Reya, and in the weeks that followed the rest of the appellants joined in that instruction and entered into a retainer agreement with the firm. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by Scott C. Idleman
This last week, a lawsuit was filed in the U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 7:25 am by Lawfare Staff
”   In other news… United States The PRC-U.S. war of words spilled well beyond Secretary Kerry’s Asia trip. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 6:53 am by Jani
This has been seen different in the United States, as under the Feist Publications v Rural Telephone Service decision (more on which can be found here) effort alone won't give a work protectability under copyright. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 1:24 pm by Inside Privacy
Less than two weeks after the Medidata decision, however, the district court in American Tooling Center, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:43 am by Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith
First, it states the “sense of Congress” that the president “shall not withdraw the United States from NATO,” and that “the case Goldwater v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am by INFORRM
United States As mentioned above, the US Senate has voted in favour of legislation that could ban TikTok in the country if its Chinese owners refuse to sell. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
Remember when she couldn't name a single Supreme Court case other than Roe v Wade? [read post]