Search for: "Wells v. Place"
Results 9561 - 9580
of 31,641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm
Even more remarkably, the other party to the case represents the estate of Crosby's first wife, who died more than 60 years ago.Crosby v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 8:35 am
In Pfeifer v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 11:46 am
In Hammerschlag v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:49 am
Paper v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 6:24 am
Seuss v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 3:59 am
" In Lands' End Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 9:38 am
Cugle started his mail order business, they are not valid in the first place and he hasn’t infringed anything,” said EFF Staff Attorney Vera Ranieri. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 10:19 am
Robart, the federal judge presiding over the Microsoft v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 3:00 am
See also, Henningsen v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 7:00 am
5) Snickers v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:45 am
” The charges, dating back to June 2007, took place at his home. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:00 pm
v=Vu0j176y5FEVideo Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991https://www.backtothemovies.com/ [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 am
Stiles v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 7:17 am
The narrow 5-4 decision in US v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 3:00 am
Patagonia, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 5:30 am
In his recent decision in the case of Grimes v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:03 am
This decision is a warning to comply with the Map Act in the first place. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:40 am
This argument was rejected in favour of tackling each separate objection to the claim language step-by-step.Trade MarksGuestKat Nedim Malovic reported on a recent decision of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, which held that the shape of Land Rover Defender cars cannot benefit from trade mark protection, bearing neither inherent nor acquired distinctiveness.OtherFormer GuestKat Laetitia Lagarde (Baker McKenzie) pointed to a number of ways in which IP lawyers are… [read post]
22 May 2015, 11:12 am
But it’s a travesty that this case was ever filed in the first place,” said EFF Staff Attorney Daniel Nazer, who is also the Mark Cuban Chair to Eliminate Stupid Patents. [read post]
