Search for: "A P.2."
Results 941 - 960
of 27,042
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2024, 10:03 am
Dict. (1986) p. 106.)[7] The court also found Falb had taken and hidden the only executed copy of the Family Trust; taken, appropriated, and hidden items of personal property; and prevented Felice from selling the Property by pursuing the probate petition. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:16 am
… [P]laintiffs did not identify any advertising or promotional materials that encouraged infringement. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:44 am
§ 5.15(1)(b), (2)(f)(3). 8. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 6:09 am
§ 2. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
Indeed, some scholars adopt this reading and suggest that the ne bis in idem bar in Article 20(2) and (3) applies as between the ICC and other international criminal courts (e.g., Astrid Reisinger Coracini and Immi Tallgren in Triffterer’s Commentary to the Rome Statute, p 916). [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 1:13 pm
As reported by QCnews.com, “[a]round 2:45 p.m. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 1:01 pm
The Georgia Supreme Court reviewed a report of the State Disciplinary Review Board recommending that it adopt the finding of a Special Master that a Columbus, Georgia attorney be suspended for a month for representing a couple in a car accident case when he obviously had little experience in this area of the law and failed to act professionally. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:29 am
Hamas is an armed band and has no legal authority under international or any other law to engage in attacks against Israel and Israelis, including specifically the kind of attacks it favors—missiles launched at civilian targets, terrorist attacks on civilians, and other efforts using force to destroy the State of Israel.[2] The relevant international law has two parts—the law governing the resort to force or the jus ad bellum and the law governing military operations during the… [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am
The parties’ briefing in Loper Bright and Relentless[1] has utterly ignored statutory sections—and one section in particular—that are crucial for understanding both why the government should lose these cases and, more importantly, why the Chevron doctrine[2] cannot and should not survive in an era of textualism. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 8:49 am
S7 (1999). p. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 8:05 am
Lowe, counsel for South Africa, it “cannot credibly be argued to be a manhunt for members of Hamas,” see Jan. 11 verbatim record, at p. 77), but on other, genocidal motivations. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 2:22 am
The court rejected these arguments and found that under the Act, non-inventors only have derivative rights that have an original source, claimed through a qualifying human inventor under sections 7(2)(b) or (c). [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit,[2] and as recently as Friday by Judge Kaplan. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 3:29 am
The other two are APE TEES (EUIPO v Nowhere, C-337/22 P) and SHOPPI (Shopify v EUIPO, C-751/22 P, see here and here)). [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 3:16 am
In this regard, Section 2 of Part III of the TRIPS Agreement, as its title illustrates, sets out the general principles applicable to “Civil and Administrative Procedures and Remedies. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 1:43 pm
§ 2. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:53 am
2) On the other hand, the Board highlights that other non-converging selections were needed, suggesting that the subrange may only add matter together with the other numerous amendments made. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Va. 2021) (involving similar anti-racism concepts); see also Does 1– 2 v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 12:01 am
., Heschel articulated to many Jewish Americans and African Americans the notion that they had a responsibility for each other’s liberation and for the plight of all suffering fellow humans around the world (“Conversation with Martin Luther King,” Conservative Judaism 22, no. 3 (Spring 1968): 1-19, p. 2.) [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm
In November 2023, Germany, together with Denmark, France, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Canada, took a position on these issues by way of an intervention under Article 63 para. 2 of the ICJ Statute and supported The Gambia’s position as applicant. [read post]
