Search for: "Arnold Doe" Results 941 - 960 of 2,488
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
 At the moment, the Category 4/5 judges are Mr Justices Arnold, Birss and Carr  - or, as Merpel is calling them, the ABCs of the English Patents Court. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:57 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
  Experts say that while the current study does not provide answers about how to end the medication errors, it does shed light on a problem that was seldom discussed. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:10 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Charlotte Divorce Attorney Matt Arnold of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question: “What does a “No-Fault’ divorce mean in NC? [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 8:22 am by Dan Ernst
  “The law firm of Thurman Arnold, Abe Fortas and Paul A. [read post]
The Court’s reluctance last year to interfere with parties’ freedom of contract is also apparent in the contractual interpretation case of Arnold v Britton & Ors [2015] UKSC 36 (Case Comment here). [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:48 am
But, credit where credit is due, it does tend to make things stand out. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
“In fact, none of the mass shootings that have grabbed headlines in the last few years would have been prevented by the gun controls proposed in response to them, and Obama’s new list of warmed-over ideas does not break any new ground in that respect. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 12:28 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
  What does the law say about aggressive driving in North Carolina? [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:25 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
All it does is remove the question from the earliest stage of the job application process. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:30 am by Josh H. Escovedo
” Counsel for the Redskins, Quinn Emanuel and Arnold & Porter, argue that this notion is disturbing. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 1:13 pm by Giles Peaker
A very belated (and brief) note on Arnold v Britton & Ors [2015] UKSC 36, as I have just realised we didn’t cover it. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 3:22 pm by Giles Peaker
What he was saying, quite correctly, was that the court should not “bring within the general words of a service charge clause anything which does not clearly belong there”. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 1:14 am by Eleonora Rosati
 The author, The Hon Mr Justice Arnold, requires no introduction.According to the publisher's website, this essential handbook for practitioners advising performers, their representatives, exploiters of performers’ rights and their representatives provides an in-depth treatment of performers’ statutory rights under Part II of the 1988 Copyright, Designs and Patents Act and subsequent legislation, together with broad coverage of the legal position of… [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 6:25 am
As regards the latter, readers may remember that a few months ago Mr Justice Arnold of the High Court of England and Wales decided a case [here] by considering whether the activities of the defendants could be protected as US fair use. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:11 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers
The respondent, Mrs Arnold, was the freehold owner of the leisure park and the lessor of the above leases (the lessor). [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 12:04 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Arnold of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “Does adultery affect my divorce case? [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 11:59 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Their reasoning makes perfect sense; currently the case before them does not involve an award in excess of the cap. [read post]