Search for: "BOARD OF EDUC. v. Board of Elections" Results 941 - 960 of 1,366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Legal marketing expert Paula Black on her In Black and White blog FunnyJunk v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:48 am by Rekha Arulanantham
The bill comes in response to a recent decision by the Maryland Court of Appeals in DeWolfe v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 7:42 am by Jeff Gamso
Board of Education, not so much (thanks, initially at least, to Eisenhower's grudging willingness to send in the national guard to enforce the Court's decisions). [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:28 am by David Gans
Board of Education, the unanimous ruling that struck down racial segregation and restored the Fourteenth Amendment’s promise of equality. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 10:15 pm by Leland E. Beck
  The Ambush Election Rule requires union elections within a very short time frame and is being challenged in the U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 12:27 pm
" Sometime later each member of the Board of Visitors was advised: "Two students were shot this morning, one fatally. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:11 pm by Zoe Tillman
Vernon Jordan Jr., a senior board member of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund and senior counsel at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by Janai S. Nelson
Board of Elections, brought by a defendant convicted of conspiring to teach and advocate the overthrow and destruction of the government. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
Interesting though… that in 2002… Leon Black became a member of the Board of Trustees for… wait for it… oh yes… Dartmouth College. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:55 am by Danielle Citron
Board of Education or the many other instances in which the court has correctly overturned acts of state legislatures, local officials, or federal prosecutors. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
It is important to emphasize, therefore, just how unprecedented that challenge is—and the potentially profound impact it could have on countless federal spending programs if the Court were to embrace it.It has long been accepted, without a whisper of any constitutional doubt, that “[a]lthough participation in the Medicaid program is entirely optional, once a State elects to participate, it must comply with the requirements of the [Act],” Harris v. [read post]