Search for: "BROOKS v. STATE"
Results 941 - 960
of 2,034
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
Howell Williams, Western Connecticut State University, “Workers Built Danbury: Deindustrialized Memory in a Hatting Town”Josh Kluever, Binghamton University (SUNY), “Sorry Waldman, We Just Couldn’t Help It: Socialist State Legislators in New York, 1912-1922”CARCERAL STATE, CARCERAL SOCIETYModerator: Elizabeth Hinton, Yale University Panelists: Max Felker-Kantor, Ball State University, “Arresting the Demand for Drugs: DARE… [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:02 am
Brooks (11-898), Agarano v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:09 am
In Jacobus v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Louis, Missouri): United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 2:20 pm
Davis that will send the Dominion v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 8:19 pm
A similar case, Namur v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 6:55 am
Jane noted that the DC Circuit denied a rehearing en banc in Allaithi v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 6:37 pm
Doss v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:02 pm
In Brooks v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:08 am
To state a cause of action for legal malpractice, the plaintiff must allege that “the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession,” and that the “breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007], quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295,… [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 3:05 pm
And, as a note that may interest only me, the CCA granted review in this case on the same day that it heard oral argument in Brooks.]PD-0811-09, Ralph Franklin Welsh v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 11:56 am
Tell us about one or two significant cases or experiences in your career.Quantel v Adobe in 1997 would be the first on the list. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Like the original Brookings report, I collected data on sextortion occurring both within and outside of the United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 1:21 pm
No Expert Testimony Or Judicial Notice The case is Brook Park v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:48 am
Previously, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled in Kujawinski v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:48 am
Previously, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled in Kujawinski v. [read post]
