Search for: "Bare v. Bare" Results 941 - 960 of 5,018
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2010, 11:06 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
"But already Chicago has passed a new gun ordinance, and, yes, a lawsuit has been filed arguing that the law is unconstitutional. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:15 pm by Gene Quinn
It has become difficult to understand why the Federal Circuit does what it does in any number of rulings, but its decisions relating to patent eligibility have set patent law back several generations, turned precedent on its head, ignored the Patent Act passed by Congress, and unnecessarily and inexplicably expanded upon bad Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am by Emily Coward
Bare rejections of Batson challenges are insufficient, as they preclude meaningful appellate review. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 11:19 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Instead they seemed to thrive during that time, notwithstanding theexistence of a technology that allows people to take them for free. managed to ignore AGU v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 5:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The fact that the deadline in the court’s scheduling order for disclosure of expert witnesses had not yet passed did not relieve plaintiff of his burden to “lay bare his proof and show that a genuine question of fact exists” in opposition to the cross motion for summary judgment (Oot v Home Ins. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, the plaintiff's allegation that the defendants "willfully delayed [her] recovery with a view to their own ends and benefit" is a bare legal conclusion, "which is not entitled to the presumption of truth normally afforded to the allegations of a complaint" (Rozen v Russ & Russ, P.C., 76 AD3d 965, 969; see Judiciary Law § 487[2]). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
The decision is about likelihood of confusion, reputed trade marks' extended protection, and passing off.* The Naked Truth: use of BARELY THERE wasn't even barely thereAnother Irish Patents Office’s decision that Jeremy reports is HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC v Dunnes Stores Ireland Company. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:29 pm
 As it turns out, the revised plans had a value improvement of about 49.93%, which was just barely enough to get the project permitted.The contractor handled the job through Travis Bond (“Bond”), the designated on-site project manager. [read post]