Search for: "Bills v. State" Results 941 - 960 of 19,656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2022, 9:16 am by Eric Goldman
He’s Wrong * Senate’s “Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017”–and Section 230’s Imminent Evisceration * The “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017” Bill Would Be Bad News for Section 230 * WARNING: Draft “No Immunity for Sex Traffickers Online Act” Bill Poses Major Threat to Section 230 * The Implications of Excluding State Crimes from 47 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 6:15 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
The bill also would expand eligibility for court-ordered drug treatment as an alternative to incarceration. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 11:31 am
State Representative Harold Dutton, Jr. has introduced a bill in the Texas Legislature to amend Texas' Open Beaches Act. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 8:18 am by INFORRM
Recalling many of the issues highlighted in Parts I – V of this commentary, the principal changes include: Most significantly, the removal of the ‘legal but harmful’ provisions from the Bill. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:05 am by JT
Comprehensive Neurological Servs., PA v Tri-State Consumer Ins. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:12 pm
On August 18, the California Supreme Court ruled in the case of Howell v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On April 22, 2024, the Tennessee Governor signed into law House Bill 2100 (“TN HB 2100”), a fair access law that will, effective July 1, 2024, apply to, among others, national banks and state banks with more than $100 billion in assets, as well as insurers. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  He was also agreed that Iowa students should know about five of the six cases mandated by the bill: Marbury v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 11:56 am by Steve Hall
And, this excerpt refers to Democrat Thomas V. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:17 pm
Thompson of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut awarded $120 million in attorneys’ fees and $3.3 million in costs in Carlson v. [read post]