Search for: "Black v. State Bar" Results 941 - 960 of 2,147
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
” (I do not accept this framework in all of its respects—especially the conclusion that an elected official is barred from taking “purely partisan” actions—but I will work with it here.) [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 10:48 pm by GJEL
Like the tobacco settlements above, this is not a traditional class action because it was led by public prosecutors rather than the plaintiff’s bar. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 8:06 am by Joy Waltemath
As such, the EEOC failed to state a plausible disparate treatment claim based on the employer revoking the black applicant’s employment offer in accordance with its race-neutral grooming policy. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 7:15 am by Eugene Volokh
Dissent: In choosing to use race as the defining characteristic for sorting employees to separate stores, companies embrace the separate but equal notion struck down in Brown v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost discusses last week’s oral argument in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Moving to the 1980s: it took empowering the courts with the Charter before bar entrance requirements banning non-citizens and bans on inter-provincial law firms were removed (Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia [1989] 1 SCR 143 and Black v Law Society of Alberta [1989] 1 SCR 591, respectively). [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 2:57 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Lawrence (Jurisdiction; Breach of Contract)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlRocks Off Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 2:57 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Lawrence (Jurisdiction; Breach of Contract)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlRocks Off Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 12:37 pm by Bernie Burk
  The contract by which the Boies Firm engaged Black Cube for Weinstein’s benefit earlier this year (available on The New Yorker website here) specifically states that it supersedes a 2014 written agreement between Black Cube and the Boies Firm, “acting on behalf of the [same] Client,” so it appears that the Boies Firm has engaged Black Cube for Weinstein’s benefit before. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:50 am by Philip Segal
The nightmare scenario is the famed Winnie the Pooh case in California, Stephen Schlesinger, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]