Search for: "Blake v. Blake" Results 941 - 960 of 1,405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2015, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
While it’s been difficult to wait for the past eight months, we are now confident that the trial of the United States of America v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906) (corporation gets Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures but not protected by Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination); Blake v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The law is very clear that an agreement to perform unaudited services does not shield an accountant from liability because an accountant must perform all services in accordance with the standard of a reasonable accountant under similar circumstances, which includes reporting fraud that is or should be apparent (see 1136 Tenants’ Corp. v Rothenberg & Co., 36 AD2d 804 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 585 [1972]; see also William Iselin & Co., Inc. v Mann Judd… [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:00 am by Anthony Lake
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the forerunner of the Court's landmark decisions in Blakely v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:27 am by Jeremy
  As regards the legal perspective, the Holly character originated from Truman Capote's creativity and it was later envisaged and adapted in an audiovisual work under Blake Edward's direction. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
Cunningham (2007), which struck down part of the state’s sentencing scheme, was dictated by the Court’s ruling in Blakely v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 4:52 pm
Foster, 206 109 Ohio St. 3d 1; 2006 Ohio 856; 845 N.E.2d 470; 2006 Ohio LEXIS 516 o Cites Sentencing Law and Policy generally for updates on Blakely and general material on sentencing. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 4:52 pm
Foster, 206 109 Ohio St. 3d 1; 2006 Ohio 856; 845 N.E.2d 470; 2006 Ohio LEXIS 516 o Cites Sentencing Law and Policy generally for updates on Blakely and general material on sentencing. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 9:24 am by David Smith
London Borough of Islington v The Unite Group Plc [2013] EWHC 508 (Admin)This is an interesting appeal in relation to the counting of storeys for HMO licensing purposes. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 9:24 am by David Smith
London Borough of Islington v The Unite Group Plc [2013] EWHC 508 (Admin)This is an interesting appeal in relation to the counting of storeys for HMO licensing purposes. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 8:24 am by Blake & Dorsten, P.A.
Rely on the knowledgeable Tampa Bay criminal defense attorneys at Blake & Dorsten P.A. to be that sort of powerful and effective advocate for you. [read post]