Search for: "Board of Education v. County Board of Education" Results 941 - 960 of 2,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
Robertson County Board of Education, 692 S.W.2d 863, 872 (Tenn.Ct.App.1985); Cadorette v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
Robertson County Board of Education, 692 S.W.2d 863, 872 (Tenn.Ct.App.1985); Cadorette v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 6:54 am by Joy Waltemath
Detroit Board of Education and declare that public sector agency fee arrangements are unconstitutional under the First Amendment. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:32 am
”Under the circumstances, said the court, it could not conclude that the penalty of termination was “so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, thus constituting an abuse of discretion as a matter of law,” the so-called “Pell standard” [Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:27 am by Edith Roberts
” At his Jost on Justice blog, Ken Jost reports on last week’s annual convention of LGBT journalists, where they discussed the “unfinished work for LGBT rights advocates” that remains after the Supreme Court same-sex marriage ruling and the prospects for Supreme Court review in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 6:18 am
Board of Education, and may have even considered dissenting, but Warren brought him around and the unanimity of the decision gave it great moral authority. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In the 1998 case of Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:04 am by SHG
Monroe County Board of Ed,, that harassment must be “severe, pervasive and objectively offensive,” is being challenged because Lhamon bastardized the test by omitting some words and changing the conjunctive to the disjunctive. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 4:12 am
Syquia v Harpursville Central School District, 568 NYS2d 263 involved the alleged partiality of members of a disciplinary panel convened under the “old” Education Law Section 3020-a.The attorney for Harpursville had advanced the argument that “a 3020-a hearing is, and is intended to be, something other than a fully impartial fact finding hearing, and that the panel members selected respectively by the Board of Education and by the teacher are… [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:46 am
*The court also referred to the decisions in Matter of Karp v North Country Community College, 258 AD2d 775; Matter of Rubenstein v Simpson, 109 AD2d 885; and Dow v Board of Trustees of Farmingdale Public Library, 75 AD2d 632 in support of its ruling.There are a number of variations on the right to payment for unused vacation accruals. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:15 am
Filing a timely administrative appealMatter of Friedman v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2011 NY Slip Op 32313(U), Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 104301/11, Judge: Donna M. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 11:56 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Discusssion with staff reflected that there had been some shortage and that one dorm lost both the JCO V and VI" (which are supervisory positions)." [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
”  At his eponymous blog, Lyle Denniston reports on the timing issues raised by the Trump administration’s revocation of prior Department of Education guidance on which the lower court had relied in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 6:37 am by Joy Waltemath
An employee who alleged that in the five months after she injured her knee at work her employer took her picture and stalked her as she attempted to work and threatened to fire her if she did not climb a ladder to replace light bulbs sufficiently stated a hostile work environment claim, a federal district court in Maryland ruled (Teasdell v Baltimore County Board of Education, September 6, 2013, Quarles, W, Jr). [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 8:09 pm by Michael
School Board District 6: Dr. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 4:08 am
"Under the circumstances, said the court, it could not conclude that the penalty of termination was "so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, thus constituting an abuse of discretion as a matter of law," the so-called "Pell standard" [Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]