Search for: "Booker v. Booker"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,434
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2007, 1:37 pm
US v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
State, 769 So. 2d at 986 .................................................................................................................7 Booker v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
State, 769 So. 2d at 986 .................................................................................................................7 Booker v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:27 am
ruling in US v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 9:49 am
Dunne, Enforcement of the Medicaid Act under 42 USC § 1983 after Gonzaga University v Doe: The "Dispassionate Lens" Examined, 74 U Chi L Rev 991 (2007) Peter D. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 8:41 pm
There is an ironic symmetry to United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 1:56 pm
US v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:12 am
As noted in prior posts here and here and here, the Sixth Circuit is currently considering en banc review of the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement after Booker in the wake of a panel's notable per curiam ruling in US v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:12 am
The latest example of circuit sentencing second-guessing comes in US v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 6:24 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 4:48 am
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 12:59 pm
Although the Supreme Court's recent holding in Rita v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 4:33 pm
Booker," and here is the full abstract:In the two years since United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 9:35 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 7:39 am
At Concurring Opinions, this post by guest blogger Anita Krishnakumar highlights that "the little-noticed case [of Ali v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 12:27 pm
Helpfully, this opinion provides this effective account of the state of Rule 32(h) after Booker in the course of articulating the First Circuit's approach: It appears that only the Seventh Circuit has held that Rule 32 no longer requires notice even for departures, having concluded that, after Booker, "the concept of departures [is] 'obsolete' and 'beside the point.'" United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 10:11 am
US v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 8:52 pm
From the Tenth Circuit, in US v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 12:27 pm
The Eighth Circuit in US v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 6:16 am
" Olmstead v. [read post]
