Search for: "Brooks v. Brooks"
Results 941 - 960
of 2,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2023, 9:54 am
Brooks v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm
Bill Baird remembers the events that produced Eisenstadt v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:40 am
It has been stressed that the question of whether the harm from a third party resulted from a positive act or from an omission by the police should not justify a different outcome and that the distinction was unmeritorious: Brooks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2005] 1 WLR 1495 at [32] and repeated in Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2015] 1 AC 1732 at [51]. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 2:53 am
Hence, he failed to show that any negligence on defendants' part proximately caused him to recover less than he was otherwise entitled to (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 3:42 am
Hence, he failed to show that any negligence on defendants' part proximately caused him to recover less than he was otherwise entitled to (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 4:36 am
The First Department has held that to establish prox.in1atc cause on a claim for legal malpractice, the “plaintiff must demonstrate that but for the attorney’s negligence, [they] would have prevailed in the underlying mailer or would not have sustained any ascertainable damages” (Brooks v, Lewin, 21AD3d 73 1, 734 [1st Dept 2005]). [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:01 am
Tipsters report that the lawyer in question is Robert Tuttle of Brooks Kushman. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:22 pm
., EEOC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 12:49 pm
If the Officers’ actions do not amount to a constitutional violation, or the violation was not clearly established, or their actions reflected a reasonable mistake about what the law requires, they are entitled to qualified immunity.)In this case, Brooks v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 9:44 am
" Prior S2KM blog posts related to structured settlement "path dependence", "emergent systems" and "culture": Spencer v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 3:22 pm
With the Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:49 pm
The Supreme Court ruling on Lawson v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:16 pm
Charles Coble at the Newsroom Law Blog comments on the United States Supreme Court's decision to deny certiorari in Salzano v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:42 pm
In Halpert v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 3:34 am
When government uses regulation to retaliate against someone’s politics, relief shouldn’t depend on whether the harassment would have silenced an ordinary citizen [Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and Thomas Berry, Cato] More thoughts on the constitutional amendment process [Mike Rappaport, Liberty and Law] To what extent did Antonin Scalia’s thinking on Article V constitutional conventions change over the years? [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 9:22 am
About the author: Ted Brooks' noteworthy trial experience includes People v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:31 am
Here are some of the best commentaries: Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein has a guest post all over the blogs -- read it at Patently-O, 271 Patent Blog, and Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates. [read post]
7 May 2023, 11:43 am
Four of the cases were Brook-Lea employees. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 3:00 pm
Norris v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:26 am
Brooks, where the officer had searched Brooks’ purse after obtaining consent to search her vehicle. [read post]
